Skip to content

OCPBUGS-63597: Remove kernel-rt from 4.12 #7965

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 31, 2025
Merged

OCPBUGS-63597: Remove kernel-rt from 4.12 #7965

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 31, 2025

Conversation

@germanparente
Copy link

@germanparente germanparente commented Oct 27, 2025

There's no more required consistency of kernel-rt to kernel in 4.12 according to OCPBUGS-63597

@germanparente
Remove kernet-rt from 4.12 according to OCPBUGS-63597
7c8edb1 
There's no more required consistency of kernel-rt to kernel in 4.12 according to  OCPBUGS-63597
@Ximinhan
Copy link
Contributor

Ximinhan commented Oct 28, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 28, 2025
@joepvd
Copy link
Contributor

joepvd commented Oct 28, 2025

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 28, 2025
@Ximinhan
Copy link
Contributor

Ximinhan commented Oct 28, 2025

oh, right, you need to only check kernel-rt
/lgtm cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 28, 2025
@germanparente
Copy link
Author

germanparente commented Oct 28, 2025

ok. Thanks. I think I should review the code. I was assuming wrongly that it makes sense to have consistency to check when there's more than one rpm.

@germanparente germanparente mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2025
Merged
@joepvd
Copy link
Contributor

joepvd commented Oct 29, 2025

/lgtm
/approve
but keeping
/hold
because merge needs to be coordinated with the other PRs linked to

/retitle OCPBUGS-63597: Remove kernel-rt from 4.12

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title Remove kernet-rt from 4.12 according to OCPBUGS-63597 OCPBUGS-63597: Remove kernel-rt from 4.12 Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joepvd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 29, 2025

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63597, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63597 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.13.0, 4.13.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

There's no more required consistency of kernel-rt to kernel in 4.12 according to OCPBUGS-63597

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson
Copy link

sdodson commented Oct 31, 2025

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 31, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit af5114e into openshift-eng:openshift-4.12 Oct 31, 2025
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 31, 2025

@germanparente: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63597: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63597 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

There's no more required consistency of kernel-rt to kernel in 4.12 according to OCPBUGS-63597

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-merge-robot commented Nov 4, 2025

Fix included in accepted release 4.12.0-0.nightly-2025-11-04-120828

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@joepvd joepvd

@Ximinhan Ximinhan

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@germanparente @Ximinhan @joepvd @openshift-ci-robot @sdodson @openshift-merge-robot